Friday, January 31, 2020

United States Defense Policy Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

United States Defense Policy - Research Paper Example The disaster energized the country especially its defense system and the administration to generate modifications in the existing defense policy. By analyzing major political transactions that occurred in the Middle East and central Asian countries it is clear that some philosophical, ethical and moral questions are involved in formulating the existing defense US defense policy. Its policies in Post Cold War period, programs against international terrorism and internal security constitute ethical and moral issues. Studies often reported that the policy is not effective to resolve various ethical and moral issues. Current defense policy of the United States’ concentrates to deter aggression against the country, its allies. Another significant element that one can find in US defense policy is the programs to control most dangerous weapons and the effective implementation of Nuclear- Proliferation Treaty. Current US defiance policy underlines effective coordination of various defiance department and security agencies. The online article entitled Security System Reform and Governance gives information about Security System Reform and it rightly comments that; â€Å"SSR frameworks should therefore address both external and internal threats to people’s safety, to law and order and to state stability.† (Manning, 2005, p.22). Existing Defense policy of the United States plays a significant role in the field of international politics, immigration, and economic transactions and its programs to prevent international terrorism constitutes desirable results. United States’ Dep artment of Defense is the central body that coordinates various agencies and supervises the process of policy making. There are a number of factors or institutions that are involved in the process of policy formation such as the Department of the Army, Navy and Air force. Other institutions are

Thursday, January 23, 2020

The Joy Luck Club - Playing the Game :: Free Essay Writer

The Joy Luck Club - Playing the Game A vivid portrait of the struggles, as well as the joys, of three generations of Asian American families is painted for us on the off white canvas used by Amy Tan in 1989, the pages of her book, The Joy Luck Club. In this portrayal of Chinese immigrants and their American born children, four family stories are brought to light, through a series of vignettes told from the view points of eight women, as they change and grow in their lives. Lives that become the pigment that, along with Tan’s taintless brush strokes become a painting fit for a museum. As the stories are unveiled to us, we begin to find the connection between mothers and daughters, as well as ties between friends. These connections, however, often turn out to be lacks of connections, as the generations find themselves having a hard time relating to one another. One family in which misconceptions occur throughout the entirety of the daughter’s life is the Jong family, whose story leads us through generations of women, who, by living their out their lives, look at things instead as simply, playing the game. The mother of the Jong family, Lindo, is a member of the Joy Luck Club, and an American immigrant who, throughout her life, as always tried to keep a balance between her Chinese self, and her new American self. Lindo fears that she may have given her daughter, Waverly, too many American opportunities, and therefore denied her of her Chinese heritage. With the Americanization of her daughter, she feels she may have closed the doors on part of her own self as well, and become herself, too American. Before Lindo came to America, she learned at an early age the power of invisible strength, of hiding ones thoughts until the time is right to reveal them. She discovers these values while in an unhappy relationship to a man she was betrothed to at an early age. â€Å" I wiped my eyes and looked in he mirror. I was surprised at what I saw. I had on a beautiful red dress, but what I saw was even more valuable. I was strong. I was pure. I had genuine thoughts inside that no one could see, that no one could ever take away from me. I was like the wind. I threw back my head and smiled proudly to myself, and then I draped the large embroidered red scarf over my face and covered these thoughts up.

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

AltaPointe Health Systems Company Essay

Define a value chain and the significance of the center of gravity. Please also provide an example of a value chain from your place of work or from a company that you have researched. A value chain is a set of activities that are associated together that start with raw materials from suppliers, then goes to a set of activities in which are involved in marketing a certain product, and then ends with providers developing the final properties to the vital purchaser. Value chains can usually be split into two parts: upstream and downstream. The upstream deals where the company begins, how it develops, and what it produces. Then, downstream starts with where the goods, for example, are being transported and how it distributes to suppliers. A company’s center of gravity is the most important part of the company and what the essential proficiencies are. It is usually where the company began, according to Galbraith. It is also where the company stands the strongest. In other words, whatever may be there strongest suit is what the company’s center of gravity is. My company that I work for, AltaPointe Health Systems, can be used as an example of a value chain. AltaPointe Health Systems is a community based company that provides services of mental health to consumers that are struggling mentally and/or patients that are struggling with substance abuse issues. We have two hospital facilities (for adults and children), many residential homes, and also outpatient services. Since the primary focus of a value chain is to study the company of value-creating events, AltaPointe’s surfaces around one primary vision and that is psychiatry. Our value chain starts with having patients who come in (voluntary or involuntary) who are mentally ill or abusing substances. They tell us what is going on and our psychiatrists make an analysis based on their assumption of the patient’s sickness. They decide whether or not our facility is right for them (especially if they come in voluntary). Our doctors and nurses have daily activities with them; whether it is group sessions or one-on-one with the  social worker and doctor, decide what is causing their problems, and make a decision on what is the best way to treat them. The patients then stay for however long it takes to get the patient stable and on the correct medications, and then send them onto our outpatient facilities where they will see a doctor once a month. In this case, our materials that we need to carry on our facilities would be: beds, medications, and supplies for nurses and staff. Activities that are involved in keeping our services are: having mentally ill patients that need psychiatric help and pay to come see us. Without them, we would not be a company. As far as distributors getting the final goods: in our case, it would be our patients getting better and having our name talked about in an extremely good way to the community and other communities near us. If we have happy patients, we will have a successful business that keeps running. Our CEO also works with Bryce Hospital in Tuscaloosa, which is another psychiatric inpatient facility. Businesses like these, are what helps us to stay open and help one another out. In what ways may a corporation’s structure and culture be internal strengths or weaknesses? Look at your organization, and analyze its structural and cultural strengths and weaknesses. How can the weaknesses be improved? There are three basic types of organizational structures. They are simple structures, functional structures, and divisional structures. Simple structures don’t have any product categories and is designed for small organizations. Functional structures are for medium-sized companies that have several products. Lastly, divisional structures are for large companies that have many product lines in different industries. A corporation’s structure can be a company’s strength and/or their weakness. If the correct structure is developed correctly, then the business can grow and thrive like it should. If the wrong structure is built, then the company could have problems operating correctly. A corporation’s structure has to get its strength from the foundation, because without the foundation you don’t have anything to build on. Based on these three structures is how you want to choose your foundation for the company/business. However, if you do choose the wrong structure, then the business could fall apart because people will not know what their accurate role is within the organization. It is almost  as if everyone would get confused on what they should be doing. Corporate culture is where the beliefs, expectations of a company, and values come together within members of the organization and is passed on from one group of employees to another. A strength of culture could be the organization’s ability to relate with one another and able to get along and be civil with other employees. It is also to have the respect of values that the CEO and other leadership members have for the company. Weaknesses would be the exact opposite. If employees do not understand what the culture is for the company or do not show respect to it, it could make a company fall really fast. Employees are a huge part of a company and without them, you have absolutely nothing. They have to have the ability and want to have respect for others and the management team. For the company I work for, our organizational structure would be a simple structure, because it is a small organization. Our internal strengths would include having the right management. I believe we have top workers that are our chief officers and are able to make excellent decisions. They are always on top of the issues that need to be worked out and help manage the Board of Directors meetings. Our foundation has always been a good one and they keep our company running in good condition at all times. Our biggest structural weakness is our employees not knowing where they stand within the company. Our top managers have difficulty with relating to our other employees whom are not in top management. We have so many employees that work within the hospitals that include: nurses, behavioral aides, security, etc., and our chief officers or hospital administrators do not take the time to try to see if they have any needs or concerns within the company. This is where our company starts making mistakes. This could be an easy fix by making sure our managers take the time to speak with them. They need to start having meetings with other employees and ask what their ideas are and what needs to be improved. As far as cultural strengths, ours is following expectations. Our employees might not like it sometimes, but they know what our CEO expects out of them. They know they cannot call in sick every time something goes wrong and they know their number one priority is the patients’ needs. Our cultural weakness is definitely communication and feedback. If something  goes wrong within one of our hospitals, it is because there was a lack of communication or someone did not speak up when they needed to. This is when the patients start getting ill and irritated. It is completely unnecessary. If our employees would care a little more about what maybe could go wrong, and communicate more than what they are doing, everything would be a lot different.

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

How Was the Moon Made

The  Moon has been a presence in our lives as long as weve existed on this Earth. It has been around our planet much longer, practically since Earth was formed. However, one simple question about this spectacular object went unanswered until fairly recently: how was the Moon made? The answer requires a deep understanding of conditions in the early solar system and how they worked during the formation of the planets. The answer to this question hasnt been without controversy. Until the last fifty years or so every proposed idea about how the Moon came into being  has had problems, either with technical aspects, or plagued by scientists own lack of information about the materials that make up the Moon. Co-creation Theory One idea says the Earth and Moon formed side-by-side out of the same cloud of dust and gas. That makes sense, given that the entire solar system arose from actions within that cloud, called a protoplanetary disk. Over time, their close proximity might have caused the Moon to fall into orbit around Earth. The main problem with this theory is in the composition of the Moons rocks. While Earth rocks contain significant amounts of metals and heavier elements, particularly below its surface, the Moon is decidedly metal-poor. Its rocks just dont match Earth rocks, and thats a problem for a theory that suggests they both formed from the same piles of material in the early solar system. The Sun and planets formed in a cloud of gas and dust called a protoplanetary disk some 4.5 billion years ago. The Moon formed about the same time as Earth, but could have been made during a collision event, rather than co-formed with Earth. NASA   If they did form at the same time, their compositions should be very similar or close to identical. We see this as the case in other systems when multiple objects are created in close proximity for the same pool of material. The likelihood that the Moon and Earth could have formed at the same time  but ended up with such vast differences in composition is pretty small. So, that raises some doubt about the co-forming theory. Lunar Fission Theory So what other possible ways could the Moon have come about?  Theres the fission theory, which suggests that the Moon was spun out of Earth early in the solar systems history. While the Moon doesnt have the same composition as the entire Earth, it does bear  a striking resemblance to the outer layers of our planet. So what if the material for the Moon was spat out of the Earth as it spun around early in its development? Well, theres a problem with that idea, too. Earth doesnt spin nearly fast enough to spit anything out and likely wasnt spinning fast enough to do it early in its history. Or, at least, not fast enough to hurl a baby Moon out to space.   The best theory about the formation of the Moon says that the infant Earth and a Mars-sized body called Theia collided early in the history of the solar system. The remnants were blasted to space and eventually coalesced to form the Moon. NASA/JPL-Caltech  Ã‚   Large Impact Theory So, if the Moon wasnt spun out of the Earth and didnt form from the same set of material as Earth, how else could it have formed? The large impact theory may be the best one yet. It suggests that instead of being spun out of the Earth, the material that would become the Moon was instead ejected from the Earth during a massive impact. An object roughly the size of Mars, which planetary scientists have called Theia, is thought to have collided with the infant Earth early in its evolution (which is why we dont see much evidence of the impact in our terrain). Material from the Earths outer layers was sent hurtling into space. It  didnt get far though, as Earths gravity kept it close by. The still-hot  matter began to orbit about the infant Earth, colliding with itself and eventually coming together like putty.  Eventually, after cooling, the Moon evolved to the form that we are all familiar with today. Two Moons? While the large impact theory is widely accepted as by far the most likely explanation for the Moons birth, there is still at least one question that the theory has difficulty in answering: Why is the far side of the Moon so different than the near side? While the answer to this question is uncertain, one theory suggests that after the initial impact not one, but two moons formed around the Earth. However, over time these two spheres started a slow migration toward each other until, eventually, they collided.  The result was the single Moon that we all know today. This idea may explain some aspects of the Moon that other theories do not, but much work needs to be done to prove that it could have happened, using evidence from the Moon itself.   As with all science, theories are strengthened by additional data. In the case of the Moon, further studies of rocks from various places on and beneath the surface will help fill in the tale of our neighbor satellites formation and evolution. Edited and updated by Carolyn Collins Petersen.